Is My Grant Subject to a Uniform Guidance Audit Under 45 CFR Part 75?

45 CFR Part 75 – WHAT IS THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE AUDIT (UGA)

The UGA is a compliance audit under Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards, (GAGAS). It is a mandatory, annual audit that is designed to test whether your company complies with your grant’s terms and conditions. If you had an NIH grant in the past, you would know it by its former name, the OMB A-133.

DOES YOUR GRANT REQUIRE A UGA?

Question 1: What type of grant award did you receive?

If you have a firm, fixed price award, you don’t need to worry about the UGA.  However, fixed price grants with the Federal government are very rare.

If you have a cost-reimbursable award, the Uniform Guidance Audit reference will be incorporated into your grant.

A cost-reimbursable award means that the government will reimburse you for the monies you spend on your innovation. Of course, those monies have to be in agreement with your proposal, and you have to be able to prove the expenditures are compliant with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and the funding agency’s supplemental policies and regulations.

Question 2: Which type of funding vehicle do you have?

Not sure if you have a fixed price or cost reimbursable award?  There are numerous funding agencies and funding vehicles subject to the Uniform Guidance Act. If you see your funding agency or award below, your award is probably subject to a UGA.

• DOE grants and cooperative agreements, including Phase I SBIR and Phase II SBIR, and ARPA-E
• NIH grants, including Phase I SBIR, Phase II SBIR, RO1s, UO1s
• Army Medical Research Office grants

Any grant with the Uniform Guidance Audit embedded in its terms and conditions

Question 3. Did you spend $750,000* on awards subject to UGA?

* When your Company’s fiscal year begins after 10/1/24 the threshold increases to $1,000,000 – so for a business with a 12/31 year end, the $1M threshold is effective in 2025.

A couple very important caveats:

• That $750,000 can come from a single award or numerous awards. For example, if you have spent $600,000 on an NIH Phase II grant and $200,000 on an NIH Phase I grant, the cumulative spending is over $750,000 and you are required to have a Uniform Guidance Audit.

• The $750,000 threshold is calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) which is accrual-based accounting. It is NOT based on how much you draw from the Payment Management System or from the ASAP system. It’s based on all of your direct costs and the proportional share of indirect costs.

• Accrual based accounting means you need to pay attention to when the services were performed and when the products were received. This is important because subcontractors, especially hospitals and universities, can be notoriously slow when it comes to invoicing you. If you get an invoice from a subcontractor in February of 2025, and it was for 12 months of services for the year ending December 31, 2024, then that invoice should be accrued and included in your 2024 fiscal accounting calculations—and your $750,000 threshold.

IF YOU ARE GOING TO BE AUDITED, AVOID UGA FINDINGS.

Worried about a UGA Audit? Speak With A Government Funding Award Expert!
Call Toll Free: 833-415-3900 – or – Schedule A Call

This is the first of our seven-part series about the Uniform Guidance Audit: 

1.  Is Your Grant Subject To a Uniform Guidance Audit?
2. What Happens During a Uniform Guidance Audit?
3. How a UGA Auditor Tests Your Company’s Internal Controls
4. How To Avoid Uniform Guidance Audit Findings on SF-425 Reporting
5. How To Avoid UGA Findings: Direct Subcontractors
6. How To Avoid UGA Findings: Direct Consultants
7. What Happens To NIH and DOE Grant Audit Findings?

If you want to go deeper into the Uniform Guidance Audit, check out our webinar.