When you receive a Phase II SBIR, STTR, RO1, U01, BARDA, ARPA-E, or BAA, you need to comply with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), specifically FAR 52.216-7. Otherwise, you may have audit findings.
After more than 30 years of specializing in government award accounting, we know the mistakes government awardees make, and how to prevent them. This 10-part blog series, “Top 10 Mistakes Government Awardees Make,” is designed to help you avoid trouble and protect your innovation and business.
When you receive a federally-funded award, it’s not free money. It’s an investment that the government is making in your innovation. As such, the government expects you to adhere to their rules and regulations, and they will check to make sure you do so through audits, which can lead to audit findings.
If you have a DOD contract, you’ll quickly become acquainted with the Defense Contract Audit Agency or DCAA.
The DCAA performs:
Additionally, you are required to prepare an incurred cost submission, which is a true-up report that must reconcile your final actual direct costs on every job and the proportional indirect charges that each project must absorb.
These true up reports have a 100% chance of being audited.
Examples of audits for NIH and DOE grantees.
Assuming you’ve negotiated an indirect cost rate, you will be subject to an audit of your annual incurred cost submission by your funding agency and may also be required to have a Uniform Guidance Audit conducted on your books.
NIH and DOE grantees who expend more than $750,000 during their fiscal year are subject to a Uniform Guidance Audit or UGA. That means they are required to find and hire a CPA firm with an expertise in government award accounting to conduct this audit.
Know that even though you are paying this firm, they are very much working for the federal government.
During the UGA, your auditor will test whether you are maintaining a FAR-compliant accounting system and comply with key grant terms and conditions. Some areas you can expect to see tested are:
There are two basic types of audit findings – internal control findings and monetary findings. Internal control findings are tedious to resolve with the funding agency – you must prove that you’ve taken action to ensure that the control has been fixed and the control failure will not happen again. Monetary findings carry real bite – you write the government a check.
Some monetary penalties can also include harsh penalties. Including a specifically unallowable item in your incurred cost submission to the DCAA carries a 100% penalty on top of the disallowance.
The resource section of our website, JamesonCPA.com is filled with helpful insights and information, from blogs to webinars to white papers and more. Here are a few items you may want to check out to avoid audit findings.
Blog: Why a FAR-compliant job cost report is critical to your SBIR award
Archived webinar about UGA Audits
White Paper: Understanding the Different Types of DCAA Audits
Checklist: 43 Steps to Far Compliance
Ready to Learn More? Speak With A Government Funding Award Expert!
Call Now: 781-862-5170 – or – Schedule A Call
I’ve been in practice for over 40 years helping our small business clients procure, manage, and survive audits on more than $6 billion in federal government contract and grant funding. We’ve been featured presenters and panel moderators at Tech Connect’s National SBIR/STTR conferences since 2010, and I’ve presented at the DOD’s Mentor Protégé Summit and present regularly for several state and local organizations.
Learn more about how we can support your needs and objectives. Join us for an enlightening discussion and take the first step towards a partnership that can make a difference.
Join us for an upcoming webinar where we’ll dive deep into the latest insights and strategies.
Reserve your spot today and take a step toward gaining valuable knowledge that can make a real impact.